×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Plan A - Draft Land Use and Neighborhood Planning Chapters

Review and comment on the draft chapters

The Draft Land Use and Neighborhood Planning Chapters for Plan A includes a description of proposed Land Use policies for the City of Atlanta. This Draft Chapter integrates materials covering the newly proposed Development Patterns and the purpose and intent of these new categories.  

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment


Question
What specific measures will be taken to address failings within the system brought to light by NTIs?
0 replies
Question
What resources are being offered and what resources will be available?
0 replies
Question
How are you ensuring this? What are the means of dispersing this information?
0 replies
in reply to Erin's comment
i agree with both points.
0 replies
Suggestion
When talking about reducing noise and classifying them as nuisances, consider this article link
0 replies
Suggestion
Encourage expanding shelter accommodations in the city, public spaces, and community gardens
0 replies
Question
How do people become part of the NPUs? Is access limited based on anything? Where can you find resources on becoming part of your neighborhood's NPU, if they have one? Why 25?
0 replies
Question
How are we supporting initiatives and legislation in these areas?
0 replies
in reply to WS #14 Participant's comment
Suggestion
I agree, it needs to be as transit is provided. The support will also not come out of thin air, it needs to be outlined in clear and specific terms.
0 replies
Suggestion
A crowded area, extremely unsafe to navigate by car (because people often park on the streets even though these roads are practically one-laned because of it). Not well trafficked enough to be encouraging similar development.
0 replies
in reply to Adeline Collot's comment
Suggestion
More covered bus stops ! More benches ! Handrails to hold on to at stops . More active buses in between so that people are not left waiting 30 mins-an hour because one was cancelled or extremely late.
0 replies
in reply to Adeline Collot's comment
I agree!
0 replies
Suggestion
These gated complexes look extremely unwelcoming, they are often unaffordable, and present a sense of false safety. They're all over atlanta now, this should not be an ideal.
0 replies
in reply to Erin's comment
Suggestion
These are great suggestions! I add that these should be encourages in existing MLSF / LLSF spaces, particularly in south atlanta, instead of plotted out for new ones.
0 replies
in reply to Erin's comment
I agree!
0 replies
in reply to Lily 's comment
Suggestion
This should be a city mandate, and it should also be checked consistently, considering what the water main break did to us in June.
0 replies
Question
Are we updating internal infrastructure such as pipes and confirming that landlords are keeping buildings up to code if they're this old?
1 reply
Question
How is a school a negative impact?
0 replies
Question
How will you determine maintenance and rehabilitation? A lot of "rehabilitation" simply means gentrification, which does nothing but drive the cost of living up, doesn't benefit city residents lives, and prioritizes comforts uncalled for by Atlanta residents.
0 replies
Question
How will you ensure this?
0 replies
Suggestion
If we are maintaining established residential areas that already fit this characteristic, especially in the inner-city areas, we should increase public transit access, green space, food options, and the like without displacing residents daily life; thereby bringing them into the city fold. We should also stray from trying to evict populations en masse to fit or attract a certain replacement demographic.
0 replies
Question
Direct contradiction to CW 9. The city cannot have both. Why do we need more LLSF?
0 replies
in reply to Adeline Collot's comment
Question
I agree. Why are we? It is a contradictory value. I think we should be discouraging auto use, but how is that going to happen if we do not prioritize walkability and accessibility to public transit?
0 replies
Suggestion
I am a resident of a neighborhood (Peachtree Park) that is marked as Medium-Lot Single Family Development. The description in the proposed plan of a Medium-Lot Single Family Development includes a reference to the permission of accessory dwelling units. To the extent that the proposed plan is suggesting changes to the current rules regarding accessory dwelling units, I am opposed to such changes. I do not believe that zoning applicable to the residential areas of the city, including Peachtree Park, should be changed. The current zoning for residential areas supports and maintains the essential character of our neighborhoods and are part of why I choose to live in this neighborhood.
0 replies
in reply to Jarrett Blankenship's comment
Suggestion
I agree. There is so much cookie cutter white, gray, black, austere-looking housing and residential spaces. We need visionaries for redefining the future landscapes and creating interesting architecture and street facing spaces. The murals have been helping, and the murals need help.
0 replies
Question
We also need to ensure we have a variety of trees, as we have a pollen problem that comes from too many male plants. Are we consulting any biodiversity specialists, especially with climate change on everyone's growing concerns?
0 replies
Question
A good idea. What does this additional greenspace look like?
0 replies
Suggestion
Create more transit corridors. The preexisting ones are not sufficient. Also, focusing density on roads lends to more dangerous accidents. And thereby falsely creates a sense of needing more secluded single-family suburban homes.
0 replies
Question
What benefits do such suburban complexes provide to the city of Atlanta that supports Atlanta residents?
0 replies
in reply to Evan Maag's comment
Suggestion
Exactly. Our public transit infrastructure, for example, is extremely underdeveloped, thereby creating lack in some spaces. We still have food deserts. Create the infrastructure. We cannot truly grow simply off of dreams.
0 replies
in reply to Adeline Collot's comment
Suggestion
I agree, and also want to add that such delineations have historically not helped the original residents of historic areas, typically black, brown, and immigrant populations, who are pushed out in favor of lease opportunities to businesses who have no understanding of the cultural significance in the area to begin with, and undermines the entire historical preservation argument. A name and a plaque do not historic conservation make, nor does it preserve the culture. I think improving the livelihood of everyone, particularly original residents is critical, so that atlanta can evolve to become a true city. This idea that suburbia will be our savior is misguided, as is the idea that historic areas must be frozen in time and untouched. As long as we prevent development companies from bulldozing over people and people uninterested in giving back to the Atlanta communities they seek to be apart of (esp those from bigger cities), we will be good. And I agree that a firm understanding needs to be made about what an established neighborhood is.
0 replies
in reply to louis prevosti's comment
Exactly. That is also why we have a housing crisis existing right now, companies profiteering off of empty lots that offer no great service to their communities, after pushing residents out.
0 replies
Suggestion
These are the suburbs of Sandy Springs, Roswell, Marietta, etc a lot of it classified as LLSF. Pricing has become so ridiculous for these areas that many white people are migrating away from it, as they originally migrated to it to be away from the black, latino, and immigrant city residents. Again, we need to be creating less of this, adding ecological green space and third spaces and increasing transit to the preexisting residential spaces.
0 replies
Our focus should be promoting high walkability. Atlanta is not considered a very walkable city, in ways that New York, Chicago, or other northern cities are. Continuing to push residential single unit developments forces people out, and will ensure the city does not retain any cultural flair or unique charm.
0 replies
Again, an unnecessary suburb that promotes inequity!
0 replies
in reply to Lily's comment
They do not promote equity*
0 replies
We do not need more suburbs. They exist to promote inequity, they do not promote it. They take away from community, HOAs harm natural environments and greenspace that could be cultivated, they seclude a certain amount of people with specific privileges to enjoy city life; and they often do this after pushing out the former residents and giving them less than they deserve. I do not approve.
1 reply
Question
So then why do we not just implement this, instead of again putting focus on suburban "single-family" residential lots that have no space in this city and do not solve a housing problem when they are being sold and rented at exorbitant prices?
0 replies
in reply to Evan Maag's comment
I agree with this. In a city with a low standard for walkability and accessible transit, we should be moving away from this.
0 replies
Suggestion
A completely unnecessary and harmful addition to Atlanta's city.
0 replies
Question
Low walkability in an area does not make any sense, if we are supposed to be considering density and a larger population coming in. It also does not fit in with an expanded public transit model. Additionally, where is the space for these single-unit houses coming from? How does it benefit Atlanta to try and force a specific suburban area into already established residential spaces? How is this not gentrification? How does it get less cars and emissions and prevent the high rate of deaths and accidents that occur on atlanta streets due to current overcrowding?
0 replies
Question
The use of Single-Family divisions for lots seems to be a really archaic and redundant terminology here. Are you saying you are creating a big suburban home and a medium suburban home? Clarify
0 replies
Suggestion
I am a resident of a neighborhood (Peachtree Park) that is marked as Medium-Lot Single Family Development. The description in the proposed plan of a Medium-Lot Single Family Development includes a reference to the permission of accessory dwelling units. To the extent that the proposed plan is suggesting changes to the current rules regarding accessory dwelling units, I am opposed to such changes. I do not believe that zoning applicable to the residential areas of the city, including Peachtree Park, should be changed. The current zoning for residential areas supports and maintains the essential character of our neighborhoods and are part of why I choose to live in this neighborhood.
0 replies
space between words too wide
0 replies
Question
Who will be part of this team? What qualifications are required for them? When does this team begin to be put together? Where can we find consistent updates on it as the project continues?
0 replies
Question
What are the current ways? Since we are suggesting continuing to explore ways.
0 replies
Suggestion
Define exactly how measures will be taken to ensure equity, design, and livability in these programs. I think this is a good idea, however, if the majority of people who are able to attend / are aware of this are disproportionately out-of-state, non black/indigenous/poc/disabled, and non-creatives, then know that this will fail to address the needs of its population, and a measure will need to be taken to remedy it. The city will be responsible for upholding this standard, that means working around work schedules, creating virtual opportunities, ensuring support for the hearing/visually/orally or otherwise impaired, ensuring people without housing are not barred from participating.
0 replies
Question
What defines an impacted neighborhood? Is this a neighborhood slotted for development, or a neighborhood that has been historically overlooked despite a dense population that likely uses transit frequently?
0 replies
Question
What is this TOD strategy? It is unclear.
0 replies
Question
Emphasizing atlanta's history of civil rights activists and civil rights movements without also acknowledging the history of suppression, gentrification and pushing out of African-American and immigrant residents from their neighborhoods (Brookhaven, Clarkston, Kirkwood, East Atlanta Village, Decatur, Edgewood, West End) to name a few, gerrymandering, and transit seclusion as a means of isolating city dwellers from whiter suburban neighborhoods is inauthentic. What is being done in this new planning to rectify this historic ignorance? How actively are these communities being informed and consulted about what is happening before it happens; and are the resources accessible; both in readability and literal access?
0 replies